Semi-Supervised Segmentation and Boundary Accuracy in Aerial Mapping Imagery: A Model Audit

Authors

  • Kai L. Scott ILR School Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA Author

Keywords:

Aerial Mapping, Image Segmentation, Semi-Supervised Learning, Boundary Accuracy, Semi-Supervised Segmentation

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of high resolution aerial mapping imagery has necessitated the development of automated, scalable solutions for land cover classification, infrastructure monitoring, and environmental assessment. While deep learning has revolutionized image segmentation, the reliance on massive fully annotated datasets poses a severe bottleneck, driving the adoption of semi supervised learning techniques. This paper conducts a comprehensive model audit of semi supervised segmentation frameworks applied to aerial imagery, with a specialized focus on boundary accuracy. Unlike standard natural images, aerial maps feature complex, densely packed objects with intricate geometries where precise boundary delineation is critical for practical applications such as cadastral mapping and urban planning. Through a systematic evaluation methodology, this research assesses how state of the art semi supervised paradigms, including consistency regularization and pseudo labeling, perform in capturing sharp morphological edges compared to their fully supervised counterparts. The audit reveals that while semi supervised models achieve comparable regional overlap metrics, they frequently exhibit significant degradation in boundary localization, often suffering from over smoothing and structural hallucination. By analyzing the interplay between unlabeled data integration and spatial precision, this study provides actionable insights into the limitations of current architectures and proposes conceptual pathways for boundary aware semi supervised training protocols.

References

1. Dong, C.; Nemet, G.; Gao, X.; Barbose, G.; Sigrin, B.; O’Shaughnessy, E. Machine Learning Reduces Soft Costs for Residential Solar Photovoltaics. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7213.

2. Guo, S.; Shen, Q.; Cao, H.-h.; Li, P.; Zhang, K.; Xie, H.; Yan, G.; Mao, C. Study on quality of standard decoction of Coptidis Rhizoma based on traditional decoction process. China J. Chin. Mater. Medica 2019, 44, 3985–3993.

3. Mokhtar, S.S.M.; Salimon, M.G. SMEs’ Adoption of Artificial Intelligence-Chatbots for Marketing Communication: A Conceptual Framework for an Emerging Economy. In Marketing Communications and Brand Development in Emerging Markets Volume II: Insights for a Changing World; Adeola, O., Hinson, R.E., Sakkthivel, A.M., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2022.

4. Boubaker, O. MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaic Systems: A Systematic Review in Current Trends and Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Discov. Energy 2023, 3, 9.

5. Fan, X.; Zhang, K.; Wang, S.; Qi, Y.; Dai, G.; Lu, T.; Mao, C. Discrimination between raw and ginger juice processed Fructus Gardeniae based on UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS and Heracles NEO ultra-fast gas phase electronic nose. Phytochem. Anal. 2025, 36, 377–393.

6. DUTH.

2025. Code of Conduct for Legal Professionals in the Use of AI. Deliverable D3.2. FAIR-PReSONS. Fair Predictions of Gender-Sensitive Recidivism GA No: 101160473. Available online: https://fair-presons.aegean.gr/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/FAIR-PReSONS-D3.2-EN-final.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2026).

7. Kar, A.K.; Kushwaha, A.K. Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Business—Insights from Opinions Using Big Data Analytics. Inf. Syst. Front. 2023, 25, 1351–1374.

8. Al-Sukker, A.; Ross, D.; Abdel-Qader, W.; Al-Akra, M. External auditor reliance on the work of the internal audit function in Jordanian listed companies. Int. J. Audit. 2018, 22, 317–328.

9. Albayrak Unal, O.; Erkayman, B.; Usanmaz, B. Applications of artificial intelligence in inventory management: A systematic review of the literature. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023, 30, 2605–2625.

10. Gao, J.; Wang, S.; Erdogdu, F.; Marra, F.; Sarghini, F.; Chen, L. Machine learning-driven innovations in food processing: A systematic review of applications, challenges, and future developments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 164, 105204.

11. Wei, S.; Wei, L.; Xie, B.; Li, J.; Lyu, J.; Wang, S.; Khan, M.A.; Xiao, X.; Yu, J. Characterization of volatile profile from different coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) varieties via HS-SPME/GC–MS combined with E-nose analyzed by chemometrics. Food Chem. 2024, 457, 140128.

12. Fei, X.; Ma, L.; Wei, A.; Shi, Q. Regional quality differences in Zanthoxylum bungeanum using sensor-based analysis and climate factors. Food Chem. 2025, 490, 145135.

13. Joshi, K.D.; Han, S.; Datta, A.; Chi, L. Innovation Through Boundary Spanning: The Role of IT in Enabling Knowledge Flows Across Technological and Geographical Boundaries. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. 2017, 13, 90–110.

14. Prasshanth, C.V.; Narayanan, S.B.; Sridharan, N.V.; Vaithiyanathan, S. Fault Detection in Photovoltaic Systems Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Captured Images and Rough Set Theory. Sol. Energy 2025, 290, 113348.

15. Maka, A.O.M.; Alabid, J.M. Solar Energy Technology and Its Roles in Sustainable Development. Clean Energy 2022, 6, 476–483.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

Issue

Section

Articles